Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1976

Supreme Court of India · 1976-01-02

C.I.T., PUNJAB, HARYANA, J & K, H.P. & UNION TERRITORY OFCH vs PANIPAT WOOLLEN & GENERAL MILLS co. LTD.CHANDIGARH

Citation / case number
SC 1971/60168
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
C.I.T., PUNJAB, HARYANA, J & K, H.P. & UNION TERRITORY OFCH
Respondent
PANIPAT WOOLLEN & GENERAL MILLS co. LTD.CHANDIGARH
Author
SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI
Bench
SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that for a deduction to be permissible under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, the expenditure must be incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business. The Court emphasized that the reasonableness of the expenditure should be assessed from the perspective of the businessman, not the Income Tax Department. The Court found that the agreement between the assessee and the selling agent constituted a joint venture rather than a simple agency, thus disallowing the claimed deductions as they did not meet the criteria under Section 10(2)(xv).

C.I.T., PUNJAB, HARYANA, J & K, H.P. & UNION TERRITORY OFCH vs PANIPAT WOOLLEN & GENERAL MILLS co. LTD.CHANDIGARH · Niyam