Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1975

Supreme Court of India · 1975-09-02

SULLEH SlNGH & ORS. vs SOHAN LAL & ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1974/60292
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SULLEH SlNGH & ORS.
Respondent
SOHAN LAL & ANR.
Author
A.N. () RAY
Bench
A.N. (CJ) RAY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the directions given by the Trial Court under Order 20, Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure are mandatory, imposing obligations on both parties that are conditional upon each other's performance. The Court found that the High Court erred in allowing the appeal of Sohan Lal while dismissing Nathi's suit, as the plaintiffs failed to deposit the decretal amount by the specified date. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the decree in favor of Sohan Lal was set aside, reinforcing the necessity of compliance with the Trial Court's orders.

SULLEH SlNGH & ORS. vs SOHAN LAL & ANR. · Niyam