Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1975

Supreme Court of India · 1975-10-08

MAULAVI ABDUR RUB FIROZE AHMED & CO. vs JAY KRISHNA ARORA

Citation / case number
SC 1974/60317
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAULAVI ABDUR RUB FIROZE AHMED & CO.
Respondent
JAY KRISHNA ARORA
Author
N.L. UNTWALIA
Bench
N.L. UNTWALIA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 20 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, the High Court has exclusive jurisdiction to try eviction suits where the value of the premises exceeds Rs. 10,000, thereby excluding the City Civil Court's jurisdiction. The Court clarified that a landlord's requirement for personal use does not need to align with the current use of the premises by the tenant, allowing for the possibility of using business premises for residential purposes. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decree for eviction.

MAULAVI ABDUR RUB FIROZE AHMED & CO. vs JAY KRISHNA ARORA · Niyam