PASUPULETI VENKATESWARLU vs THE MOTOR & GENERAL TRADERS

The Supreme Court held that under Section 10(3)(iii)(a) and (b) of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960, the High Court can consider subsequent events when determining the maintainability of eviction petitions. The Court found that the landlord's subsequent possession of another property during the proceedings was relevant and justified the dismissal of the eviction petition. The appeal was partially allowed, affirming the High Court's decision to dismiss the eviction petition based on the new facts.