Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1975

Supreme Court of India · 1975-02-11

RAM KUMAR PANDE vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Citation / case number
SC 1972/60501
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAM KUMAR PANDE
Respondent
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Author
M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG
Bench
M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that in appeals against acquittals, the appellate court should not interfere unless the trial court's view is not reasonably sustainable based on evidence. The Court found that the High Court erred in convicting the appellant under Section 302/34 IPC, as the evidence presented was not credible and the FIR omitted crucial details. The Court also clarified that under the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970, an appeal against a conviction following an acquittal lies as a matter of right without needing a High Court certificate.

RAM KUMAR PANDE vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH · Niyam