STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs SINDHI @ RAMAN

The Supreme Court held that the trial of an accused sentenced to death does not conclude with the Sessions Court's proceedings, as the death sentence requires confirmation by the High Court, making it a continuation of the trial under Section 465 of the CrPC. The Court emphasized that the High Court must hear the accused in confirmation proceedings, either personally or through counsel, and cannot arbitrarily accept medical opinions without thorough examination. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision to postpone proceedings due to the accused's unsound mind.