PUTTI KONDALA RAO & ORS. vs VELLAMANCHILI SITARATTAMMA & ANR.

The Supreme Court held that the trial Court's decision to uphold the sale of property under Order XXI Rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure was correct, as there was no substantial injury proven by the appellants. The High Court's reversal of the trial Court's judgment was deemed unjustified, as the appellants failed to adequately allege substantial injury resulting from the alleged irregularities in the sale process. The Court restored the trial Court's judgment, affirming that the sale was conducted at a fair price considering the property's condition and market value.