Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1975

Supreme Court of India · 1975-12-05

BHUPENDRA RATILA THAKKAR AND ANR. vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT & ORS

Citation / case number
SC 1972/60289
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BHUPENDRA RATILA THAKKAR AND ANR.
Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT & ORS
Author
P.N. SHINGAL
Bench
P.N. SHINGAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the seizure of property under Section 132 and Section 132A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, must be justified and cannot be arbitrary. The Court held that the provisions of these sections do not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(f) and (g), and 31(1) of the Constitution, affirming their constitutionality. The petitioners' request for restoration of seized property was denied as the respondents provided sufficient grounds for the seizure based on the belief that the petitioners would not produce necessary documents for tax proceedings.

BHUPENDRA RATILA THAKKAR AND ANR. vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT & ORS · Niyam