MAHAMMADUNNI'S SON KAPPATTA KATHOKANDATH BAVA vs KUNHOOSA'S SON AMPALATH VEETTIL KUNNATHODATH MAHAMMADUNNI &

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding that defendant No. 3 was married to defendant No. 1 during a lucid interval, despite the appellant's claims of her mental unsoundness. The Court emphasized that once a person is adjudged insane, the presumption of insanity continues until proven otherwise. The evidence presented, particularly from a teacher who attended the marriage, supported the High Court's conclusion that defendant No. 3 consented to the marriage, thus affirming the High Court's decision.