Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1975

Supreme Court of India · 1975-08-13

BAR COUNClL OF MAHARASHTRA vs M. V. DABHOLKAR ETC. ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 1974/60310
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BAR COUNClL OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondent
M. V. DABHOLKAR ETC. ETC.
Bench
RAY, A.N. (CJ),KHANNA, HANS RAJ,MATHEW, KUTTYIL KURIEN,BEG, M.H. & KRISHNAIYER, V.R.,GUPTA, A.C. & FAZALALI, S.M.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the State Bar Council qualifies as a 'person aggrieved' under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961, allowing it to appeal against decisions made by the Bar Council of India. The Court reasoned that the term 'person aggrieved' is broadly interpreted to include entities like the Bar Council, which represents the collective interests of the legal profession and is tasked with maintaining professional standards. The Court allowed the appeal from the State Bar Council, emphasizing its role in upholding the dignity and decorum of the legal profession.

BAR COUNClL OF MAHARASHTRA vs M. V. DABHOLKAR ETC. ETC. · Niyam