MANPHUL SINGH vs SURINDER SINGH

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to allow inspection of ballot paper counterfoils under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, emphasizing that such inspections are necessary for justice when there are credible allegations of impersonation. The Court clarified that while election petitioners must not engage in fishing expeditions, the High Court had sufficient material to establish a prima facie case of impersonation in approximately 310 instances. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's order for further investigation into the allegations.