Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1973

Supreme Court of India · 1973-03-26

MANAGEMENT OF TOURNAMULLA ESTATE vs WORKMEN

Citation / case number
SC 1968/60322
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MANAGEMENT OF TOURNAMULLA ESTATE
Respondent
WORKMEN
Bench
GROVER, A.N.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Clause (4) of the Gratuity Scheme, a workman's gratuity can be forfeited if found guilty of serious misconduct, such as riotous and disorderly behavior. The Court clarified that misconduct is categorized into three types, with serious misconduct allowing for complete forfeiture of gratuity. The appeal was allowed, overturning the Labour Court's decision in favor of the workman, as the dismissal was justified due to the nature of the misconduct.

MANAGEMENT OF TOURNAMULLA ESTATE vs WORKMEN · Niyam