Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1973

Supreme Court of India · 1973-01-24

RAMANLAL BHOGILAL SHAH AND ANOTHER vs D. K. GUHA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
SC 1972/60371
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAMANLAL BHOGILAL SHAH AND ANOTHER
Respondent
D. K. GUHA AND OTHERS
Author
SIKRI, S.M. (),RAY, A.N.,PALEKAR, D.G.,BEG, M. HAMEEDULLAH,DWIVEDI, S.N.
Bench
SIKRI, S.M. (CJ),RAY, A.N.,PALEKAR, D.G.,BEG, M. HAMEEDULLAH,DWIVEDI, S.N.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India, which protects individuals from being compelled to be witnesses against themselves. The Court held that an accused person, once formally charged or arrested, cannot be compelled to appear before an enforcement officer to provide evidence related to the same offence. The judgment clarified the interpretation of 'accused' under Article 20(3), emphasizing the protection against self-incrimination in the context of the Foreign Exchange (Regulation) Act, 1947.

RAMANLAL BHOGILAL SHAH AND ANOTHER vs D. K. GUHA AND OTHERS · Niyam