Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1972

Supreme Court of India · 1972-05-03

AMAR CHANDRA CHAKRABORTY vs COLLECTOR OF EXCISE, GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1971/60246
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
AMAR CHANDRA CHAKRABORTY
Respondent
COLLECTOR OF EXCISE, GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA & ORS.
Author
SIKRI, S.M. (),RAY, A.N.,DUA, I.D.,PALEKAR, D.G.,BEG, M. HAMEEDULLAH
Bench
SIKRI, S.M. (CJ),RAY, A.N.,DUA, I.D.,PALEKAR, D.G.,BEG, M. HAMEEDULLAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Collector has the authority to withdraw a liquor license under Section 43 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, affirming that the license was validly granted and could be revoked. The Court applied the principle of ejusdem generis, clarifying that the phrase 'any cause other than' in Section 43 must be interpreted in light of the specific causes listed in Section 42. The Court found that the withdrawal of the license did not violate Article 14 or Article 19 of the Constitution, and that the requirements of natural justice were met despite the absence of a show cause notice.

AMAR CHANDRA CHAKRABORTY vs COLLECTOR OF EXCISE, GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA & ORS. · Niyam