Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1972

Supreme Court of India · 1972-12-11

PANDHARINATH SHRIDHAR RANGNEKAR vs DY. COMMR. OF POLICE, THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA

Citation / case number
SC 1972/60339
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PANDHARINATH SHRIDHAR RANGNEKAR
Respondent
DY. COMMR. OF POLICE, THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA
Bench
CHANDRACHUD, Y.V.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 56 of the Bombay Police Act, the externing authority must provide a reasoned order and full particulars of the allegations against the individual to ensure a fair opportunity for defense. The Court found that the appellant was not adequately informed of the specific allegations, violating Section 59(1), which mandates informing the person of the general nature of the material allegations. Consequently, the externment order was set aside due to the lack of proper disclosure and reasoning, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.

PANDHARINATH SHRIDHAR RANGNEKAR vs DY. COMMR. OF POLICE, THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA · Niyam