Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1972

Supreme Court of India · 1972-08-28

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, GORAKHPUR vs RAM PRASAD AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1969/60046
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
INCOME-TAX OFFICER, GORAKHPUR
Respondent
RAM PRASAD AND ORS.
Bench
HEGDE, K.S.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 14 of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, assessments must be made on individuals or partnerships carrying on business jointly, and not on a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) post-partition. The Court held that Section 44 of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922, applies only to firms and associations, and since an HUF is a separate entity, the notices issued for assessment were invalid. Thus, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision.

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, GORAKHPUR vs RAM PRASAD AND ORS. · Niyam