Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1972

Supreme Court of India · 1972-08-29

SUMAT PRASAD JAIN vs SHEOJANAM PRASAD (DEAD) & ORS

Citation / case number
SC 1969/60045
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUMAT PRASAD JAIN
Respondent
SHEOJANAM PRASAD (DEAD) & ORS
Bench
SHELAT, J.M.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the distinction between a Trade Mark and a property mark is crucial, as defined under Section 479 IPC. A Trade Mark indicates the connection between goods and their manufacturer, while a property mark denotes ownership of movable property. The Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, affirming that the High Court correctly identified the appellant's actions as counterfeiting a property mark, thus upholding the conviction under Sections 482 and 486 IPC.

SUMAT PRASAD JAIN vs SHEOJANAM PRASAD (DEAD) & ORS · Niyam