Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1972

Supreme Court of India · 1972-08-23

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX U.P. LUCKNOW vs M/S. GANGADHAR BAIJNATH GENERAL GANG, KANPUR

Citation / case number
SC 1968/60026
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX U.P. LUCKNOW
Respondent
M/S. GANGADHAR BAIJNATH GENERAL GANG, KANPUR
Bench
HEGDE, K.S.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the entire sum received by the B-firm upon the exit of its partners from the BJ-firm was a revenue receipt assessable under Section 10 of the Income Tax Act, 1922. The Court established that the distinction between capital and revenue receipts is largely factual, and in this case, the payments received were for the surrender of partnership rights, not for the cessation of business activities. The judgment clarified that the compensation was related to the termination of a contract in the ordinary course of business, thus reinforcing the principle that such payments are treated as revenue receipts.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX U.P. LUCKNOW vs M/S. GANGADHAR BAIJNATH GENERAL GANG, KANPUR · Niyam