Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1971

Supreme Court of India · 1971-05-04

SRIRAM NARAYAN MEDHI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Citation / case number
SC 1968/60407
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SRIRAM NARAYAN MEDHI
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Author
SIKRI, S.M. (),MITTER, G.K.,VAIDYIALINGAM, C.A.,RAY, A.N.,REDDY, P. JAGANMOHAN
Bench
SIKRI, S.M. (CJ),MITTER, G.K.,VAIDYIALINGAM, C.A.,RAY, A.N.,REDDY, P. JAGANMOHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1964, ruling that it is protected under Article 31A of the Constitution. The Court clarified that once an Act is covered by Article 31A, rights under Articles 14, 19, and 31 cannot be claimed to be infringed. The amendments, which pertained to the recovery of amounts from tenant purchasers, did not alter the fundamental purpose of the Act, thus maintaining its protection under Article 31A.

SRIRAM NARAYAN MEDHI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA · Niyam