JAGE RAM AND ORS. vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, specifically sections 17(2)(c) and 38 to 44B, ruling that the government's declaration of public purpose is not subject to challenge unless proven to be for a collateral purpose or a colorable exercise of power. The Court found that the acquisition was justified due to urgency, as the state had contributed to the cost, negating the need for proceedings under Part VII of the Act. Additionally, the Court clarified that the ejusdem generis rule does not apply to section 17(2)(c) when the legislative intent is clear and unambiguous.