Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1971

Supreme Court of India · 1971-01-22

N.B. SANJANA, ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBA vs ELPHINSTONE SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS CO. LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 1967/44
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
N.B. SANJANA, ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBA
Respondent
ELPHINSTONE SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS CO. LTD.
Bench
VAIDYIALINGAM, C.A.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Rule 10A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 does not apply when a short levy occurs due to error or misconstruction by an officer, as Rule 10 specifically addresses such situations. The Court affirmed that the proper action should have been taken under Rule 10, which allows for the collection of short levies within three months of payment. The Court clarified that 'levy' does not imply actual collection and that 'paid' should be interpreted contextually, meaning 'sought to have been paid'. The High Court's ruling that the demand notices were illegal due to the three-month limitation was upheld, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

N.B. SANJANA, ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBA vs ELPHINSTONE SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS CO. LTD. · Niyam