Supreme Court of India · 1971-01-22
N.B. SANJANA, ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBA vs ELPHINSTONE SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS CO. LTD.
- Citation / case number
- SC 1967/44
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Petitioner
- N.B. SANJANA, ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBA
- Respondent
- ELPHINSTONE SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS CO. LTD.
- Bench
- VAIDYIALINGAM, C.A.
Judgment text excerpt
The Supreme Court held that Rule 10A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 does not apply when a short levy occurs due to error or misconstruction by an officer, as Rule 10 specifically addresses such situations. The Court affirmed that the proper action should have been taken under Rule 10, which allows for the collection of short levies within three months of payment. The Court clarified that 'levy' does not imply actual collection and that 'paid' should be interpreted contextually, meaning 'sought to have been paid'. The High Court's ruling that the demand notices were illegal due to the three-month limitation was upheld, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.