Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 1969

Supreme Court of India · 1969-07-25

A.K. JAIN & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1966/60537
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
A.K. JAIN & ORS.
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Author
K.S. HEGDE
Bench
K.S. HEGDE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of sub-rule 3 of Rule 3 of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1955, stating that it is enforceable under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, which applies to food crops. The Court rejected the argument that the Bihar Sugar Factories Control Act, 1937, precluded Parliament's authority to legislate on sugarcane pricing, affirming that Parliament has the competence to regulate foodstuffs under Entry 33 of List III of the Constitution. The Court also ruled that there was no violation of Article 19(1) as there is no fundamental right for a buyer to delay payment for goods purchased.

A.K. JAIN & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. · Niyam