Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1969

Supreme Court of India · 1969-02-14

V.D. M. R. M. M. R. M. MUTHIAH CHETTIAR vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS

Citation / case number
SC 1968/60121
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
V.D. M. R. M. M. R. M. MUTHIAH CHETTIAR
Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS
Bench
SHAH, J.C.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 16(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the Income-tax Officer is obligated to compute the total income of an individual by including certain items of income, but the taxpayer is not required to disclose income liable for inclusion under this section. The Court ruled that reassessment proceedings under Section 34(1)(a) could not be initiated for failure to disclose such income, leading to the conclusion that the assessments for the years 1952-53 and 1953-54 were not valid. Furthermore, it was established that the income of a minor can be included in the hands of an assessee under Section 16(3), even if a separate assessment has been made on the minor.

V.D. M. R. M. M. R. M. MUTHIAH CHETTIAR vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS · Niyam