Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1969

Supreme Court of India · 1969-02-24

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS vs S. CHENNIAPPA MUDALIAR, MADURAI

Citation / case number
SC 1968/60112
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS
Respondent
S. CHENNIAPPA MUDALIAR, MADURAI
Bench
GROVER, A.N.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 33(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, the Appellate Tribunal is required to decide appeals on their merits rather than dismissing them for default of appearance, as the language of the statute mandates a decision based on the correctness of the points raised. The Court found that Rule 24 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1946, which allows dismissal for default, is ultra vires Section 33(4) and thus invalid. The appeal was allowed, reinforcing the necessity for the Tribunal to provide a substantive ruling on the merits of the case.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS vs S. CHENNIAPPA MUDALIAR, MADURAI · Niyam