BUDHAN SINGH & ANR. vs NABI BUX & ANR.

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 9 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, clarifying that the term 'held' refers to lawful possession and not merely physical occupation. The Court held that the respondents, who had fled during communal riots and returned to find their buildings replaced, were entitled to claim possession under Section 9, as their absence did not negate their lawful rights. The judgment emphasized the need for a reasonable interpretation of statutes to avoid harsh outcomes.