Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1969

Supreme Court of India · 1969-04-29

BALDEVDAS SHIVLAL & ANR. vs FILMISTAN DISTRIBUTORS (INDIA) (P) LTD. & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1967/163
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BALDEVDAS SHIVLAL & ANR.
Respondent
FILMISTAN DISTRIBUTORS (INDIA) (P) LTD. & ORS.
Bench
SHAH, J.C.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court lacked jurisdiction under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to determine the issue of res judicata regarding a consent decree in a revision application. The Court clarified that the Trial Court's refusal to try certain preliminary issues did not constitute a 'case decided' as per Section 115. Consequently, the High Court's findings on the issue of res judicata were set aside, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings, allowing parties to present evidence.

BALDEVDAS SHIVLAL & ANR. vs FILMISTAN DISTRIBUTORS (INDIA) (P) LTD. & ORS. · Niyam