Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1968

Supreme Court of India · 1968-10-18

ROMESH CHANDRA MEHTA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Citation / case number
SC 1967/183
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ROMESH CHANDRA MEHTA
Respondent
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Author
SHAHC.,RAMASWAMI, V.,MITTER, G.K.,HEGDE, K.S.,GROVER, A.N.
Bench
SHAH, J.C.,RAMASWAMI, V.,MITTER, G.K.,HEGDE, K.S.,GROVER, A.N.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the admissibility of confessional statements made to customs officers under the Sea Customs Act, 1878, and the Customs Act, 1962. It held that customs officers are not considered police officers under Section 25 of the Evidence Act, thus confessions made to them are admissible. The Court clarified that the powers of customs officers do not equate to those of police officers in terms of investigation, and the admissibility of statements must be evaluated based on the provisions of Section 25 and Article 20(3) of the Constitution.

ROMESH CHANDRA MEHTA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL · Niyam