Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1968

Supreme Court of India · 1968-01-10

VIRUDHUNAGAR STEEL ROLLING MILLS LIMITED vs THE GOVERNMENT OF MADRAS

Citation / case number
SC 1967/83
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VIRUDHUNAGAR STEEL ROLLING MILLS LIMITED
Respondent
THE GOVERNMENT OF MADRAS
Author
WANCHOO, K.N. (),BACHAWAT, R.S.,SHELATM.,MITTER, G.K.,VAIDYIALINGAM, C.A.
Bench
WANCHOO, K.N. (CJ),BACHAWAT, R.S.,SHELAT, J.M.,MITTER, G.K.,VAIDYIALINGAM, C.A.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the petitioner's writ petition under Article 32 was barred by res judicata as the petitioner did not appeal from the Division Bench's speaking order dismissing the earlier petition. The Court clarified that a speaking order, even if made without notice to the other side, disposes of the matter on merits and thus bars subsequent petitions on the same facts. The Court also upheld the validity of Section 12 of the Madras Electricity (Taxation on Consumption) Act, 1962, stating it was not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

VIRUDHUNAGAR STEEL ROLLING MILLS LIMITED vs THE GOVERNMENT OF MADRAS · Niyam