Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1968

Supreme Court of India · 1968-12-03

PAYMENT OF WAGES INSPECTOR vs SURAJMAL MEHTA & ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1966/60394
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PAYMENT OF WAGES INSPECTOR
Respondent
SURAJMAL MEHTA & ANR.
Bench
SHELAT, J.M.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that compensation under Section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 qualifies as wages under the amended definition in Section 2(vi)(d) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, as it is payable due to termination of employment without specifying a payment timeline. The Court clarified that the authority under Section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act has jurisdiction to entertain applications related to wages, including retrenchment compensation. The High Court's ruling that the proper forum was the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) was overturned, affirming the authority's jurisdiction under the Payment of Wages Act.

PAYMENT OF WAGES INSPECTOR vs SURAJMAL MEHTA & ANR. · Niyam