Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1968

Supreme Court of India · 1968-08-20

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI vs SHRI PRAKASH CHAND JAIN

Citation / case number
SC 1966/60436
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI
Respondent
SHRI PRAKASH CHAND JAIN
Bench
BHARGAVA, VISHISHTHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, an Industrial Tribunal can disregard the findings of a domestic inquiry if those findings are perverse, meaning they are not based on legal evidence or are unreasonable. The Court held that hearsay evidence cannot be considered legal evidence in domestic inquiries, and findings based solely on such evidence are perverse. The Tribunal's decision to not approve the dismissal was upheld as the findings were deemed perverse due to lack of substantive evidence.

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI vs SHRI PRAKASH CHAND JAIN · Niyam