Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1967

Supreme Court of India · 1967-09-28

ANANDJI HARIDAS & CO. (P.) LTD. vs S. P. KUSHARE, S. T. O. NAGPUR & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1966/60104
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ANANDJI HARIDAS & CO. (P.) LTD.
Respondent
S. P. KUSHARE, S. T. O. NAGPUR & ORS.
Author
WANCHOO, K.N. (),BACHAWAT, R.S.,RAMASWAMI, V.,MITTER, G.K.,HEGDE, K.S.
Bench
WANCHOO, K.N. (CJ),BACHAWAT, R.S.,RAMASWAMI, V.,MITTER, G.K.,HEGDE, K.S.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of notices issued under Section 11(4)(a) of the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947, in light of Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court held that notices for multiple quarters were valid despite the incorrect assessment year mentioned, as the appellants had not submitted returns for the relevant periods. Furthermore, the Court ruled that the 30-day notice requirement under Rule 32 was not violated, affirming the assessment made by the Commissioner under the best judgment principle as per Section 11A(1) and (3).

ANANDJI HARIDAS & CO. (P.) LTD. vs S. P. KUSHARE, S. T. O. NAGPUR & ORS. · Niyam