Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1967

Supreme Court of India · 1967-03-02

MANEKLAL CHHOTALAL & ORS. vs M. G. MAKWANA & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1966/60198
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MANEKLAL CHHOTALAL & ORS.
Respondent
M. G. MAKWANA & ORS.
Author
RAO, K. SUBBA (),SHAHC.,SIKRI, S.M.,RAMASWAMI, V.,VAIDYIALINGAM, C.A.
Bench
RAO, K. SUBBA (CJ),SHAH, J.C.,SIKRI, S.M.,RAMASWAMI, V.,VAIDYIALINGAM, C.A.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954, is constitutionally valid under Entry 18 of List II and Entry 20 of List III of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that legislative heads should be interpreted broadly unless restricted by the Constitution. The petitioners' claims that the Act conferred arbitrary powers and violated their fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(f), and 31 were dismissed, affirming the Act's purpose of orderly urban development.

MANEKLAL CHHOTALAL & ORS. vs M. G. MAKWANA & ORS. · Niyam