Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 1967

Supreme Court of India · 1967-07-18

THE VIth INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CITY CIRCLE II-A, ABANGALORE vs K.Y. PILLAIAH & SONS

Citation / case number
SC 1966/60142
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE VIth INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CITY CIRCLE II-A, ABANGALORE
Respondent
K.Y. PILLAIAH & SONS
Bench
SHAH, J.C.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 34 of the Mysore Income-tax Act, if a notice is served within four years from the close of the assessment year, the Income-tax Officer can complete the reassessment proceedings even after the four-year period has expired, as there is no prescribed time limit for completing the proceedings. The Court found that the High Court erred in restraining the Income-tax Officer from proceeding with the reassessment, as the notice served in March 1951 was valid. The appeal was allowed, and the High Court's order was set aside.

THE VIth INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CITY CIRCLE II-A, ABANGALORE vs K.Y. PILLAIAH & SONS · Niyam