Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1967

Supreme Court of India · 1967-04-07

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTA vs RAI BAHADUR HARDUTROY MOTILAL CHAMARIA

Citation / case number
SC 1966/60170
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTA
Respondent
RAI BAHADUR HARDUTROY MOTILAL CHAMARIA
Bench
RAMASWAMI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 31(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner cannot enhance the income of an assessee based on sources not considered by the Income-tax Officer during assessment. The Court affirmed the High Court's ruling that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to add Rs. 5,85,000 to the assessed income as it was not examined for taxability by the Income-tax Officer. The judgment clarified that 'consideration' does not encompass incidental examination of matters during assessment.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTA vs RAI BAHADUR HARDUTROY MOTILAL CHAMARIA · Niyam