Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1966

Supreme Court of India · 1966-09-12

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA vs SHRI GOKAL CHAND

Citation / case number
SC 1966/60249
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
Respondent
SHRI GOKAL CHAND
Bench
BACHAWAT, R.S.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 38(1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, ruling that it does not permit appeals from interlocutory orders made by the Controller, as such orders do not affect the rights or liabilities of the parties involved. The Court emphasized that interlocutory orders are procedural and meant to assist in the final adjudication of a case. Consequently, the appeal against the Controller's refusal to issue a commission was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the Tribunal and the High Court.

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA vs SHRI GOKAL CHAND · Niyam