Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1966

Supreme Court of India · 1966-10-27

Rm. Ar., Ar. Rm. Ar. RAMANATHAN CHETTIAR vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS

Citation / case number
SC 1965/233
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rm. Ar., Ar. Rm. Ar. RAMANATHAN CHETTIAR
Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS
Bench
RAMASWAMI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the interest paid to the assessee under the decree of the Supreme Court of Ceylon on the estate duty refund is taxable under the Indian Income-tax Act, specifically under Section 4(3)(vii). The Court clarified that such interest is not a capital receipt but rather income of a recurring nature, as it was calculated on a daily basis from the date of the trial court proceedings. The jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 66 was also affirmed, emphasizing that it can only decide questions referred to it or arising from the Tribunal's order.

Rm. Ar., Ar. Rm. Ar. RAMANATHAN CHETTIAR vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS · Niyam