Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1966

Supreme Court of India · 1966-03-11

M. PADMANABHA SETTY vs K. P. PAPIAH SETTY

Citation / case number
SC 1965/15
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M. PADMANABHA SETTY
Respondent
K. P. PAPIAH SETTY
Author
P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR,K.N. WANCHOO,M. HIDAYATULLAHC. SHAH,S.M. SIKRI
Bench
P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, CJ,K.N. WANCHOO,M. HIDAYATULLAH,J.C. SHAH,S.M. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order for eviction under Section 8(3)(a)(ii) of the Mysore House Rent and Accommodation Control Act, 1951, clarifying that a tenant does not have an absolute right to possession and cannot be deemed 'entitled to possession' if the landlord requires the premises for his own business. The Court found that the appellate court erred in not following the precedent set in Narayanappa v. Narasimhiah, leading to material irregularity. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the eviction order.

M. PADMANABHA SETTY vs K. P. PAPIAH SETTY · Niyam