Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1966

Supreme Court of India · 1966-03-01

BADKU JOTI SAVANT vs STATE OF MYSORE

Citation / case number
SC 1964/90305
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BADKU JOTI SAVANT
Respondent
STATE OF MYSORE
Author
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (),WANCHOO, K.N.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAHC.,SIKRI, S.M.
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ),WANCHOO, K.N.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAH, J.C.,SIKRI, S.M.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Section 167(81) of the Sea Customs Act encompasses individuals not directly involved in the importation of smuggled goods, thereby affirming the High Court's interpretation over the Calcutta High Court's ruling in Sitaram Agarwala's case, which was disapproved. Additionally, the Court clarified that officers under the Central Excise and Salt Act do not qualify as police officers under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act, making statements recorded by them admissible in court. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the High Court's conviction.

BADKU JOTI SAVANT vs STATE OF MYSORE · Niyam