Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1966

Supreme Court of India · 1966-01-06

RAM GOPAL REDDY vs ADDITIONAL CUSTODIAN EVACUEE PROPERTY,HYDERABAD

Citation / case number
SC 1963/188
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAM GOPAL REDDY
Respondent
ADDITIONAL CUSTODIAN EVACUEE PROPERTY,HYDERABAD
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ),WANCHOO, K.N.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,RAMASWAMI, V.,SATYANARAYANARAJU, P.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 46 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, civil courts lack jurisdiction to adjudicate on whether property is evacuee property. The appellant's claim to ownership was barred as he failed to appear before the authorities after being notified, and the absence of a registered sale deed meant title could not pass. The Court emphasized that any claims must be pursued through the mechanisms provided in the Act, thus dismissing the appeal.

RAM GOPAL REDDY vs ADDITIONAL CUSTODIAN EVACUEE PROPERTY,HYDERABAD · Niyam