Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1966

Supreme Court of India · 1966-02-08

RANJIT SINGH vs PRITAM SINGH & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1965/25
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RANJIT SINGH
Respondent
PRITAM SINGH & ORS.
Author
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (),WANCHOO, K.N.,SHAHC.,SIKRI, S.M.,RAMASWAMI, V.
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ),WANCHOO, K.N.,SHAH, J.C.,SIKRI, S.M.,RAMASWAMI, V.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 33(5) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, a candidate is not required to file a copy of the electoral roll with each nomination paper, as the purpose is to ensure the returning officer can verify qualifications. The Court ruled that filing a copy of the electoral roll of an assembly constituency suffices for a parliamentary constituency, and the rejection of the nomination papers was incorrect. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the election, affirming that the returning officer's actions were not in accordance with the law.

RANJIT SINGH vs PRITAM SINGH & ORS. · Niyam