Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1966

Supreme Court of India · 1966-02-07

SHRI RAM PRASAD (DECEASED) BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
SC 1964/90314
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHRI RAM PRASAD (DECEASED) BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE
Respondent
THE STATE OF PUNJAB
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ),WANCHOO, K.N.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,RAMASWAMI, V.,SATYANARAYANARAJU, P.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Bank of Patiala Regulation and Management Order, 1954, was valid and came into effect on February 27, 1954, despite its later publication. The Court ruled that the delegation of powers to the Board of Directors to frame staff rules was valid and did not violate Article 311 or Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court upheld the compulsory retirement of the appellant under Rule 27, affirming the legality of the Staff Rules framed by the Board.

SHRI RAM PRASAD (DECEASED) BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB · Niyam