Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1966

Supreme Court of India · 1966-02-23

CALTEX INDIA LIMITED vs PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1964/90308
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CALTEX INDIA LIMITED
Respondent
PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, AND ORS.
Author
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (),WANCHOO, K.N.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAHC.,SIKRI, S.M.
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ),WANCHOO, K.N.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAH, J.C.,SIKRI, S.M.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 26(1) of the Bihar Shops and Establishments Act, 1954, ruling that the power granted to the State Government to prescribe misconduct punishable by dismissal without notice does not constitute excessive delegation. The Court established that the legislature provided sufficient guidance by indicating that only major misconducts justifying dismissal could be included. Consequently, the appeal challenging the constitutionality of the section was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision.

CALTEX INDIA LIMITED vs PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, AND ORS. · Niyam