Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1966

Supreme Court of India · 1966-08-25

N. S. SHETHNA vs VINUBHAI HARILAL PANCHAL

Citation / case number
SC 1964/90269
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
N. S. SHETHNA
Respondent
VINUBHAI HARILAL PANCHAL
Bench
SHELAT, J.M.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under the Bombay Cinema (Regulation) Act, 1953 and the Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954, the renewal of a cinema licence is considered a fresh grant rather than a continuation of the previous licence. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision that a show cause notice related to the expired licence for 1960 could not be applied to the renewed licence for 1961 without a fresh notice. Consequently, the order suspending the renewed licence was quashed, reinforcing the necessity of due process in administrative actions regarding licence renewals.

N. S. SHETHNA vs VINUBHAI HARILAL PANCHAL · Niyam