Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1965

Supreme Court of India · 1965-10-06

UNION OF INDIA vs SUKUMAR PYNE

Citation / case number
SC 1964/90376
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
UNION OF INDIA
Respondent
SUKUMAR PYNE
Author
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (),WANCHOO, K.N.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAHC.,SIKRI, S.M.
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ),WANCHOO, K.N.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAH, J.C.,SIKRI, S.M.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Sections 23(1) and 23D of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, do not violate Articles 14 and 20 of the Constitution. The Court established that an accused does not have a vested right to be tried by a particular court or procedure unless there is a constitutional objection. Furthermore, the new procedural law is not deemed retrospective as it does not affect any rights under the Criminal Procedure Code, and the penalties prescribed do not exceed those under the previous law, thus upholding the validity of the amendments.

UNION OF INDIA vs SUKUMAR PYNE · Niyam