Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1965

Supreme Court of India · 1965-10-08

RATAN LAL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Citation / case number
SC 1964/90371
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RATAN LAL
Respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Author
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (),WANCHOO, K.N.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAHC.,SIKRI, S.M.
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ),WANCHOO, K.N.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAH, J.C.,SIKRI, S.M.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the appellant's conviction under Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, for possessing Ayurvedic medicinal preparations containing alcohol exceeding 12% was erroneous. The Court found that on the date of attachment, the preparations were deemed unfit for use as intoxicating liquor under Section 6A(7), and a subsequent declaration by the State could not have retrospective effect. Therefore, the appellant's possession was not an offence, and the conviction was set aside.

RATAN LAL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA · Niyam