Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1965

Supreme Court of India · 1965-01-19

BABU AND 3 OTHERS vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Citation / case number
SC 1964/90559
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BABU AND 3 OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Author
WANCHOO, K.N.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAHC.,MUDHOLKARR.,SIKRI, S.M.
Bench
WANCHOO, K.N.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAH, J.C.,MUDHOLKAR, J.R.,SIKRI, S.M.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 429 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the third Judge is free to resolve differences as he sees fit, and his decision does not require extensive discussion of the First Information Report. The Court clarified that a certificate of fitness for appeal under Article 134(1)(c) must involve substantial questions of law, and the High Court should be cautious in granting such certificates. The Court also stated that the imposition of a death sentence should not be treated as a rule when there is a difference of opinion between two judges on sentencing, emphasizing that each case must be evaluated on its own merits.

BABU AND 3 OTHERS vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH · Niyam