Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1965

Supreme Court of India · 1965-02-10

SRI-LA-SRI SUBRAMANIA DESIKA GNANASAMBANDAPANDARASANNADHI vs STATE OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
SC 1964/90430
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SRI-LA-SRI SUBRAMANIA DESIKA GNANASAMBANDAPANDARASANNADHI
Respondent
STATE OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ)

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 64(4) of the Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951, a quasi-judicial inquiry is necessary for extending an existing notification, similar to the requirements under Section 64(3). The Court found that the Government must provide a reasonable opportunity to the trustee before making such decisions, as it affects their rights. The High Court's refusal to issue a writ was deemed incorrect as the appellant had raised the plea of natural justice in their rejoinder, and the notification's validity was extended by a new Act before the High Court's judgment.

SRI-LA-SRI SUBRAMANIA DESIKA GNANASAMBANDAPANDARASANNADHI vs STATE OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER · Niyam