STATE OF BOMBAY (NOW MAHARASTRA) vs NARUL LATIF KHAN

The Supreme Court held that under Rule 55 of the Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, an enquiry officer is mandated to provide a charge-sheeted officer the opportunity to present oral evidence if requested. The Court found that the refusal to allow the respondent to examine his doctors constituted a violation of Article 311(2) of the Constitution, which guarantees a reasonable opportunity to defend oneself. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal of the State Government, affirming the High Court's decision in favor of the respondent.