Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1965

Supreme Court of India · 1965-12-10

BINAYAK SWAIN vs RAMESH CHANDRA PANIGRAHI AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
SC 1963/193
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BINAYAK SWAIN
Respondent
RAMESH CHANDRA PANIGRAHI AND ANOTHER
Bench
RAMASWAMI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a party is entitled to restitution when a decree has been set aside, regardless of subsequent proceedings. The appellant's application for restitution was valid as it was filed before a fresh decree was passed, establishing that the principle of restitution mandates restoring parties to their original position prior to the erroneous decree. The Court held that the appellant was entitled to restitution, reversing the High Court's decision that denied it.

BINAYAK SWAIN vs RAMESH CHANDRA PANIGRAHI AND ANOTHER · Niyam