Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1965

Supreme Court of India · 1965-08-09

V. N. SARIN vs MAJOR AJIT KUMAR POPLAI

Citation / case number
SC 1965/88
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
V. N. SARIN
Respondent
MAJOR AJIT KUMAR POPLAI
Author
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (),WANCHOO, K.N.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAHC.,SIKRI, S.M.
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ),WANCHOO, K.N.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAH, J.C.,SIKRI, S.M.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 14(6) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, determining that a partition of Hindu undivided family property does not constitute a 'transfer' as per the Act's provisions. The Court held that the nature of partition transforms joint titles into separate titles for co-parceners, and thus, a person acquiring property through partition does not fall under the restrictions of Section 14(6). Consequently, the High Court's ruling allowing eviction based on personal need under Section 14(1)(e) was upheld.

V. N. SARIN vs MAJOR AJIT KUMAR POPLAI · Niyam